She Really Said That??
On Aug. 4, 1993, the New York Times reported that “Ruth
Bader Ginsburg easily won confirmation” as an Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. With 52
Democrat votes in the Senate, this was no big surprise.
The unthinkable was that 44 Republican Senators joined them;
only three Senators stood for America on that fateful day, not unlike the three
young Hebrews who refused to bow to the golden idol of ancient times, and voted
no: Don Nickles (R-OK), Jesse Helms (R-NC), and Bob Smith (R-NH). May God bless them forever.
How could stalwart conservatives like Grassley, McConnell, and
Hatch not have known about this woman’s ultra-lib, satanic agenda? They did
know. They knowingly and consensually granted judicial authority to a woman who
was a traitor to her country, a blasphemer of God, and a destroyer of the
family. May God hold them all accountable in His own time.
How do we know they knew that she was not “moderate” as some
said, but indeed a notorious lawbreaker?
Let us look at her own words regarding women in the
military, moral standards, family, and language as she wrote in
1977, for the U.S. Commission on Human Rights, “Sex Bias in the U.S. Code."
Remember: the Republican Senators called her “moderate.”
WOMEN IN THE MILITARY
Women must be drafted when men are drafted. "Equal rights and responsibilities for
men and women implies that women must be
subject to draft registration ..."
(p. 202)
Women must be assigned to combat duty. "Implementation
of the equal rights principle requires a unitary system of appointment,
assignment, promotion, discharge, and retirement, a system that cannot be
founded on a combat exclusion for women."
(p. 26)
Affirmative action [bias based on gender, race] must be
applied for women in the armed services. "The need for affirmative action
and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed
services." (p. 218)
MORAL STANDARDS
The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to
12 years old. "Eliminate the phrase
'carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the
age of 16 years' and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the
offense. . .A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with
another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years
old." (p. 102)
2. Bigamists must have special privileges that
other felons don't have. "This section restricts certain rights, including
the right to vote or hold office, of bigamists, persons *cohabiting with more
than one woman,' and women cohabiting with a bigamist. Apart from the
male/female differentials, the provision is of questionable constitutionality
since it appears to encroach impermissibly upon private
relationships." (pp.
195-196)
3. Prostitution must be
legalized: it is not sufficient to change the law to sex-neutral language. "Prostitution
proscriptions are subject to several constitutional and policy objections. Prostitution, as a consensual act between
adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent
constitutional decisions." (p. 97) "Retaining prostitution business as
a crime in a criminal code is open to debate.
Reliable studies indicate that prostitution is not a major factor in the
spread of venereal disease, and that prostitution plays a small and declining
role in organized crime operations." (p. 99) "Current provisions
dealing with statutory rape, rape, and prostitution are discriminatory on their
face. . . . There is a growing national
movement recommending unqualified decriminalization [of prostitution] as sound policy,
implementing equal rights and individual privacy principles." (pp. 215-216)
5224. The Mann Act
must be repealed; women should not be protected from "bad" men. "The
Mann Act . . . prohibits the transportation of women and girls for
prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose. The act poses the invasion of privacy issue
in an acute form. The Mann Act also is
offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates. ... It was meant to protect from the villainous interstate and international
traffic in women and girls,' *those women and girls who, if given a fair
chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and
useful citizens. . . . The act was meant
to protect weak-women from bad men." (pp. 98-99)
5. Prisons and reformatories must be sex-integrated. "If
the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the
community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society,
then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected. ... 18 U.S.C.§4082, ordering the Attorney
General to commit convicted offenders to *available suitable, and appropriate'
institutions, is not sex discriminatory on its face. It should not be applied... to permit consideration of a person's gender
as a factor making a particular institution appropriate or suitable for that person." (p. 101)
6.
In the merchant marine, provisions for passenger accommodations must be
sex-neutralized, and women may not have more bathrooms than men."46 U.S.C.
§152 establishes different regulations for male and female occupancy of double
berths, confines male passengers without wives to the * forepart' of the
vessel, and segregates unmarried females in a separate and closed
compartment. 46U.S.C. §153 requires
provision of a bathroom for every 100 male passengers for their exclusive use
and one for every 50 female passengers for the exclusive use of females and
young children."(P- 190)
523"46 U.S.C. §152 might be changed to allow double
occupancy by two ^consenting adults.' . . .
Requirements for separate bathroom facilities stipulated in Section 153 should be retained but equalized
so that the ratio of persons to facility is not sex-determined." (p. 192)
FAMILY
"The adult world is divided into two
classes—independent men, whose primary responsibility is to win bread for a
family, and dependent women, whose primary responsibility is to care for
children and household. This concept
must be eliminated."
LANGUAGE
The word, "human," is not in the original text of the King James Bible. It is a word that came into use around the 12th century. "Man" or "mankind" are words used for those made in the image of God. "Hu" can be perceived as "hue," or color. A color is a shade, and a hu+man equals a "shade of man" or "color of man." Shades are not real. Color is a semblance or appearance of something, but not the real thing.
Here is the concept of "color of law" to help us understand:
Color of law refers to an appearance of legal power to act that may operate in violation of law. For example, if a police officer acts with the "color of law" authority to arrest someone, the arrest, if it is made without probable cause,
may actually be in violation of law. In other words, just because
something is done with the "color of law" does not mean that the action
was lawful.
So a human who is "color of man" is not a lawful man. Re-naming God's creation is a way of waging war on God Himself. This is exactly what Ruth Bader Ginsburg did with replacing terms within the body of law.
Lawbreakers do not qualify for judging the Law. This woman was a criminal, not only by man's law but by God's eternal Law. Those who approved of her licentiousness are guilty themselves of the same.
