Sunday, June 28, 2020

COUNTER DECLARATION TO MAYOR OF LOCKHART, PT. 2

In Pt. 1, you read how the mayor of Lockhart issued a DECLARATION mandating all businesses to force all employees and customers to wear masks. 

I showed you how this is "POLITICAL CRIME BOSS" tactics, I debunked the FAKE SCIENCE (1) of asymptomatic persons transmitting COVID and the FAKE SCIENCE (2) that facial coverings stop the virus. 

Next, I pointed out that the mayor was overstepping his jurisdiction and encroaching on the duties of the County Judge by issuing a mandate based on county numbers. 

The mayor invoked the Emergency Powers under Texas Gov. Code 418, and I showed you how the definition of "imminent," violating the letter and spirit of state law. 

Now we come to the most important points that all Americans should know. All mask orders violate the republican form of government. 
____________________




State and Federal: Violation of Republican Form of Government

Article IV, Section 4 of The Constitution of The United States of America: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government.” 

Article 1, Section 2 of the Texas Constitution concurs: “INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All  political  power  is  inherent  in  the  people,  and  all  free  governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

What is the “republican form of government”? It is the greatest blessing the world has ever seen. It is why people have fled oppression and tyranny, risking their lives and fortunes, to make it to our shores. It is the acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual to rule his own life and enjoy the liberties that he has been endowed with by his Creator. It is the limitation of government to exist for the sole purpose of protecting that sovereignty. It is the idea that government serves man, and conversely that man does not exist for the benefit of the state. 

Forcing people to wear a mask (via crime boss politics, above) is a violation of the republican form of government for three reasons.  

1.    Violation of the individual conscience (our most sacred of property) and religious beliefs.  

Like Caesar requiring the pinch of incense, submission of the will is the real goal. Whether the initiate dipped their little finger or shoveled a handful made no difference. As long as the Roman acknowledged Caesar as his master, a certificate was given and the citizen could do business in Rome for one year.  

Why is it that “facial coverings” are considered adequate protection instead of OSHA-approved medical devices that actually confer benefit?  Because it is the gesture of obedience that matters, not the power of the mask to prevent disease. Unquestioning obedience to the modern Caesar, the state, is anathema to the republican form of government.  

It is a mistake to think that there is separation of church and state. All law is based on someone’s idea of who God is. Our nation, unique in the world, was created on the idea that the God of the Bible, Yahweh, is the one true God. The concepts of private property, the value of the life of image-bearers of God from conception to natural death, and the liberty of man to serve Him and their fellow man with love and free will comprise the pre-suppositional world view of Christians. 

Some choose another way – collective (state-owned) property, arbitrary value of life, and the duty of man to serve the state are their ideals. Compulsion and deception are their methods, and they must rely on dark powers and threats of terror to force people’s compliance. We know these people as occultists. All the vile dictators and tyrants of history have had some connection to the occult, with performance of magick rituals, sacrifices, sexual perversions, and dependence on symbolism.    

Occultists say that masks are “living things” --
 “A mask is an ancient and powerful magical mediator among the worlds of the living, the dead, and the spirits. Ancient peoples understood well the power of the mask. Evidence of mask-wearing in prehistoric societies shows that masks may have been intended to transform the wearer magically to achieve or acquire something…
Masks have been used throughout history in numerous rituals, liturgies, theater, and folk art. The mask has been revered as a sacred object of power, a living thing that either has its own persona or represents the persona of another being. It enables the wearer magically to bring to life, and even become, the persona or spirit being represented by the mask.
A mask connects its wearer to archetypal powers residing within the collective unconscious. The mask is a mediator between the ego and archetype, the mundane and the supernatural, the sacred and the comic. It connects the present to the past, the individual to the entire collective of race, culture, country—and humanity.
In the modern West, masks have lost much of their sacred and deep symbolic meaning.” – Occult World
“Powerful magical mediator.” I’m a Christian. I do not practice magic, nor do I celebrate Halloween and by all means, I do not wear masks. By forcing me to put on a mask to enter the store where I buy necessary food, I am being blackmailed into denying my faith.

“Power of the mask.” Witchcraft, giving power to inanimate objects.

“Transform the wearer magically…” In other words, demon possession.

“Masks have been used throughout history in numerous rituals, liturgies.” Are you being given full disclosure, that wearing a mask is part of a ritual? A liturgy is a religious practice. What religion are you becoming part of?

“A sacred object of power, a living thing.” The word “sacred” has to do with spiritual deities. When you wear a mask, are you inviting a living thing to be part of you?

“That has its own persona.” Do inanimate objects carry living spirits, personas? Yes. The occult world calls this “familiar spirits.”

“Collective unconscious… the entire collective of race, culture, country—and humanity.”  John Lennon sang the NWO anthem, “Imagine” that we could all live as one. This is not the unity that Jesus spoke of for His followers. Satan wants his followers to be as one with him.

In 2010 in Lockhart, there were two Wiccans who planned a ritualistic drum circle event.  They advertised their event as “family friendly.” Here is their ad:

Come meet your neighbors, make new friends and make beautiful music! Please bring your musical instruments and put on your dancing shoes and come to Lockhart’s first drum circle! Bring your chair, your snacks and your smiles and enjoy a night under the stars at the beautiful City Park.

The main objective is to share rhythm and get in tune with each other and themselves. To form a group consciousness. To entrain and resonate. By entrainment, I mean that a new voice [as in “new normal”?], a collective voice, emerges from the group as they drum together. This is the purpose of this drum circle. To unite our community and to build friendships through this collaboration of music.

Do you see those words, “Collective” and references to the group consciousness? What is going on here – the qualities of the mask being the same as a Wiccan ritual?


Even the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era,  May 21, 2020) sees the mask as a “TALISMAN,”  

Talisman
Object which is believed to contain certain magical properties

A talisman is an object that someone believes holds magical properties that provide particular power, energy, and specific benefit...

·         It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals. Although such reactions may not be strictly logical, we are all subject to fear and anxiety, especially during times of crisis. One might argue that fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial mask… but it is difficult to get clinicians to hear this message in the heat of the current crisis.

2.    Self-preservation and self-defense being the bedrock of natural law and the essence of liberty, mask mandates force one to endanger his own health.

OSHA requires a 19.5% oxygen level for safety. Kenny Larson proves with an oxygen meter that within seconds of wearing a mask, the oxygen drops to dangerous levels. This is why many people are getting headaches, passing out, having auto accidents. Undoubtedly we will be hearing of a rise in cancer diagnoses, as cancer thrives in a low oxygen environment. Here’s Kenny’s short video:  https://www.facebook.com/kenny.larson.12/videos/4199997636707319/

Dr. Judy Mikovits, noted virologist, says more about the need for oxygen, "Do you not know how unhealthy it is to keep inhaling your carbon dioxide and restricting proper oxygen flow? The body requires ample amounts of oxygen for optimal immune health. Proper oxygenation of your cells and blood is essential for the body to function as it needs to in order to fight off any illness. Masks will hamper oxygen intake.”

Dr. Russell Blaylock, neurosurgeon, says, "We have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention; are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications ... By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” He adds a special warning for the elderly, “Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind — which can cause a severe worsening of lung function.”

3.    Mask mandates stealthily enforce Sharia law, which is unlawful and seditious and an assault on our Constitution.   

Mayor White, you have taken an oath to uphold our Constitution. Any action that supports, aids, or abets Sharia law is perjury. The “facial coverings” that you are enforcing (via mafia crime boss tactics, above) are NIQAB, which are worn by Muslim women as an act of worship of Allah.  

France and Canada have banned traditional clothing (burqa, niqab) as being a sign of oppression and subjugation of women. Yet now, Americans are being led to embrace such abusive symbolism in the name of “health.”  Since women do most of the shopping, American women are, like their Muslim sisters, feeling the heavy hand of Talibanist legalism.  

Radical Islamists, e.g., Muslim Brotherhood, have been brought into our country by the former administration of Obama with the intent to destroy the republic. What could not be accomplished by force and invasion is being done by stealth. This is inherent in the ideology of Islam, "The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”
Facial coverings that pretend to protect from COVID are frauds. The mortality of the virus is waning, deaths decreasing, but mask mandates are increasing. There seems to be no end, and even further oppression if the projections are into October as your Declaration states. 

NOTICE

Your actions as an “Oath Breaker” have been reported to a law firm that is documenting violations of the U.S. Constitution and USC 18 Sect. 242, for “deprivation of rights under color of law” and violation of religious liberty under the First Amendment.  

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;


CONCLUSION

All the trespasses of mafioso politics, fudging the science, failing to maintain proper jurisdiction, and pushing the limits of emergency powers could be results of human frailty and misunderstanding, and though not benign, are able to be remedied.  

However, violations against the conscience of the people, forcing them to bow to another god, denying them the rights guaranteed by the hallowed documents of this nation’s organic law are very serious and not as easily dismissed. This is not merely incompetency. This is treason.  

The fact that the majority by far of the mask edicts and strict lockdowns over the whole nation are coming from Democratic politicians cannot go unnoticed. All public servants, regardless of party affiliation, have taken oaths to uphold the law of the land, but party politics – for some reason – seem to hold a stronger sway than their oaths before the Lord.
Mayor White, you have a great opportunity to practice what you preach, to be the “example, “ and solve this problem. 

So what is to be done? As writer J.B. Handley says, “Now what?

What should be done is so damn simple, IMO, but it never will, because too many people would have to admit they were wrong. But, I’ll say it anyway. My policy recommendation: 
 
·         remove 100% of newly created lockdown rules [including mask mandates to businesses],

·         secure nursing homes using Florida’s approach [sending COVID-positive patients to the hospital],

·         tell everyone with an active COVID-19 infection to stay home until symptoms resolve or wear a mask if they need to go out in public,

·         and encourage everyone else to wash their hands.  

Done deal.” 

Done deal. 

Democrats and Republicans and Libertarians will be blessed, maybe not all will be happy, but liberty will be secure for all. And that’s a very good deal.
__________________________________

COUNTER DECLARATION TO MAYOR OF LOCKHART, PT. 1


 Background: On June 23, the mayor of Lockhart, Texas, issued a DECLARATION for all commercial entities to enforce masks on their employees and customers. This is a COUNTER DECLARATION, debunking the pseudo-science and exposing the egregious errors that violate many laws.

CITY OF LOCKHART, TEXAS AMENDED MAYORAL DECLARATION OF LOCAL STATE OF DISASTER DUE TO PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY AND REGARDING FACIAL COVERINGS IN COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE CITY, ISSUED AND DECLARED JUNE 23 2020. (“DECLARATION”)

COUNTER DECLARATION
Mayor White:

You recently said, regarding the peace and safety of Lockhart, “Be the example, not the problem.”  Sir, you have caused a big problem for the people of Lockhart. 

Political Crime Boss
By mandating that stores need to mandate masks, you are employing Mafia tactics to hire others to do the job that is illegal and unethical for you to do. 

Gov. Abbott knows that it is unlawful to require the public to wear facial coverings, as that mandate would violate unalienable rights. By transferring the task to business owners, the liability is also transferred. Business owners who comply to bully customers to perform any act in order to secure necessary food and supplies – whether it’s standing on their head, crawling on their knees, or putting on a facial covering under the color of “emergency”-- are putting themselves at great risk for lawsuits. 

Politicians know this. They know that they have public official bonds that protect them from lawsuits should they overreach their authority. Business owners, such as we are, have no such protection, as our own carrier has advised us. A bully politician could have hefty claims against his/her bond, and while payouts for claims crush future electability (similar to car insurance increasing with more accidents), the bond company would pay any damages on behalf of the controlling entity and the politician’s personal wealth is spared. 

This is not the case for a sole proprietor. Should someone claim damages from being forced to wear a mask (anxiety, pleurisy, infection, rash, heart attack / high blood pressure from low oxygen, for example), that store owner’s insurance will not cover the claimant’s injuries. The world learned this principle at Nuremberg in 1945-49, that doing something that injures someone else, even though you did it under the ‘authority’ of someone else, does not mean you get a free pass. Stores owned by deep pocket corporations may survive such lawsuits, but as in this entire assault on our economy, it is the small business owner once again who bears the brunt. 

NOTICE

Your actions as an “Oath Breaker” have been reported to a law firm that is documenting violations of the U.S. Constitution and USC 18 Sect. 242, for “deprivation of rights under color of law.”  

What was the economic impact? Example: Dollar amount or loss of customers, loss of supplies, loss of supply chain, employees laid off etc.
Ans. Our liability carrier advised us that if we require masks of customers, and they make a claim that they suffered any untoward medical issue due to our mandate, we could be sued. Our policy does not cover those claims.



 
Your basis for mandating facial coverings is based on your assertion, “WHEREAS, infected persons can transmit the COVID-19 virus to others before showing any symptoms...”
Says who? Not the WHO, World Health Organization, because their officials say the opposite:

"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual. We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts and they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It is very rare -- and much of that is not published in the literature. We are constantly looking at this data and we're trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question. It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward."  -- Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization’s technical lead for coronavirus response and head of the emerging diseases and zoonoses unit. 

Rare. Very rare. Rare. In Maria’s short media conference of June 9, she said “rare” three times. This is a big deal. 

A second witness to your Fake Science is the National Institutes of Health’s article from May 13 that was published in Respiratory Medicine, titled, “A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers.” 

A 22-year old woman in Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital was admitted for a heart condition. She tested positive for COVID-19. She was completely asymptomatic.  Researchers did contact tracing on 455 of her contacts. ZERO were found to be infected.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/

“…455 contacts who were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier became the subjects of our research. They were divided into three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. We extracted their epidemiological information, clinical records, auxiliary examination results and therapeutic schedules. In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection...”

Fake Science Part 2: Facial coverings stop the virus

“WHEREAS…widespread and consistent use of face coverings over the nose and mouth when in public is a critical and necessary measure to help slow the spread of the virus…” 

On the contrary-- “critical”? “necessary”? Real science, known as truth, says otherwise:
Healthy people do not need to wear masks:

·         “If you do not have any respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough or runny nose, you do not need to wear a mask,” says Dr. April Baller, a public health specialist for the WHO. “Masks should only be used by health care workers, caretakers or by people who are sick with symptoms of fever and cough.”

On Feb. 6 of this year, researchers in Hong Kong presented a meta-analysis that went as far back as 1946 that is found on our own CDC website and is supported by WHO,  Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures.” 

Note that this study was a look at TEN randomized controlled trials (RCT), 1946-2018. TEN. Clear conclusions. Comprehensive science. Not hysteria. Not propaganda that supports a political agenda. Under the heading of Personal Protective Measures, Masks, we read:

·         Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
·         “In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs [Randomized Controlled Trial] that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018….In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks…Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza….Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission.”
Canadian physicist D.G. Rancourt published Masks Don't Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy” last month in ResearchGate. He said, basically, that if you can breathe through a mask, it is not preventing transmission of viral particles. 

·         “Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.”

The British Medical Journal, 2015, published the world’s first study of the efficacy of cloth masks compared to medical masks in a hospital setting, “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers.” Participants were 1,607 health-care workers in high-risk wards of a Hanoi hospital over a four-week period. Results: 

·         The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of [Influenza-Like Illness, ILI] statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI and laboratory-confirmed virus were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.

Conclusions This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.  
I hope the reader grapples that last sentence to their souls with hoops of steel:  Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.  Thus saith the British Medical Journal:
CLOTH MASK = INCREASED RISK OF INFECTION

Now let us examine the New England Journal of Medicine, “Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era,”  

·         We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
“Reflexive reaction.” Another term for reflexive is
“knee jerk, an immediate unthinking emotional reaction.”

Knee-jerk reactions have no place in the limitation of a free people’s unalienable rights by fiat order.

And perhaps, as is said, the best has been saved for last. Here is a pre-COVID article for the dentistry profession by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, October 18, 2016, “Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review”. https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/

Though written for dentists [Mayor White is a dentist], the science can be extrapolated to the general public concerned about spread of COVID-19. 

·         “The science regarding the aerosol transmission of infectious diseases has, for years, been based on what is now appreciated to be ‘very outmoded research and an overly simplistic interpretation of the data.’ Modern studies are employing sensitive instruments and interpretative techniques to better understand the size and distribution of potentially infectious aerosol particles…The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection.”

·         “It should be concluded from these and similar studies that the filter material of face masks does not retain or filter out viruses or other submicron particles. When this understanding is combined with the poor fit of masks, it is readily appreciated that neither the filter performance nor the facial fit characteristics of face masks qualify them as being devices which protect against respiratory infections. ”

·         By all means, do not miss Dr. Hardie’s Conclusion:
“…Surely, the hallmark of a mature profession is one which permits new evidence to trump established beliefs. In 1910, Dr. C. Chapin, a public health pioneer, summarized this idea by stating, “We should not be ashamed to change our methods; rather, we should be ashamed not to do so.”  Until this occurs, as this review has revealed, dentists have nothing to fear by unmasking.” 
For failing to rely upon true science rather than politically-sourced sound bytes, Mayor White, you have shown incompetency to serve the people of Lockhart as their mayor.  


Local: Wrong Jurisdiction

As mayor of Lockhart, you have the lawful right to govern affairs in the City of Lockhart. The County of Caldwell is the jurisdiction of the County Commissioners. Judge Haden has not issued any mask order.

Yet, your basis for mandating businesses to mandate facial coverings is the “286 confirmed cases…two deaths, four hospitalizations, 50 recoveries, and the others active” in Caldwell County

I have learned that the two deaths were at a nursing home.  

286 cases among a county population of 40,500 is 0.7%. That means 99.3% of the people of Caldwell County are unaffected. 

2 deaths among 40,500 is 0.0049% 

The county’s death rate for 2010 was 7.8/1000. Current population is 40,500. We could expect 316 deaths this year if that rate holds steady. Being as we are half way through the year, that would be 158 expected deaths from all causes to date. 

Yet, the entire city is put on a draconian facial covering mandate for 2 deaths in a nursing home, who could have had several co-morbidities.

For failing to restrict your authority to your proper jurisdiction, Mayor White, you have shown incompetency to serve the people of Lockhart as their mayor. 

 
State: Wrong Application of Emergency Powers
Demanding facial coverings of the general public in order to access commercial services by invoking Texas Emergency Code 418 is an egregious violation of the letter and spirit of the law.
               Sec. 418.004.  DEFINITIONS.  In this chapter:
(1)       "Disaster" means the occurrence or imminent threat of widespread or severe damage, injury, or loss of life or property resulting from any natural or man-made cause, including fire, flood, earthquake, wind, storm, wave action, oil spill or other water contamination, volcanic activity, epidemic, air contamination, blight, drought, infestation, explosion, riot, hostile military or paramilitary action, extreme heat, cybersecurity event, other public calamity requiring emergency action, or energy emergency.

“Imminent” means “ready to take place, happening soon (Merriam-Webster); likely to occur at any moment; impending (dictionary.com).”

Your DECLARATION is not consistent with the law. You cite the Institute of Health Metrics & Evaluation which “includes a projection that there may be 5,567 fatal cases in Texas by October 1, 2020. 

·         Projection
·         May be
·         By October 1

Clearly, this is NOT an “imminent” crisis. 

NOTICE
Your actions as an “Oath Breaker” have been reported to a law firm that is documenting violations of the U.S. Constitution and USC 18 Sect. 242, for “deprivation of rights under color of law.”  

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;  

For failing to follow the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS in both spirit and letter, Mayor White, you have shown incompetency to serve the people of Lockhart as their mayor.